|
We must anticipate a future without
oil in order to prevent global crisis
By Jerome le Carrou
September 22, 2005 | According to
the American geologist King Hubbert, the production
of oil will reach its peak (the Hubbert peak) in Middle
East around 2010.
Hubbert announced in the 1950s that American production
of oil would reach its peak in 1970.
He was right.
If he's right again, around 2010, half of the oil resources
in the Middle East would have been used up. Middle East
oil resources are the most important ones.
For the first time, the shortage of oil will not be
politic but simply geologic. In the '70s, OPEC artificially
created an oil shortage for political reasons.
It's also the same political reasons that define the
"black gold" as important enough to drive governments
crazy, especially now that decisions-makers know oil
resources are going to decrease slowly.
We can always wonder why Iraq has been attacked recently,
but part of the reason may be that oil resources are
important and easy to extract. The cost or oil extraction
in Iraq is not even the half of the cost to extract
oil from Alaska.
Some researchers said we will lack oil around 2040
if we continue to consume it at the same rhythm. Researchers
disagree, with some of them based their projections
on the fact that the consumption will still be constant.
However, this fact seems to be irrelevant.
First of all, in the last few years, two new, big
consumers entered the market (China and India) and changed
the oil consumption formulas. Secondly, the consumption
can't stay regular with all the governments aware of
the upcoming oil extinction. It's easy to understand
-- if tomorrow on the news, I hear that there are 10,000
liters of water available in the city before the city
runs out of water forever, I think I will rush and get
as more as I can. As a result, I will increase the consumption
of water, which mean we will be out of water sooner.
This principle is the same for the oil consumption.
All in all, it means that the end of oil resources
can happen one day around 2030 at the earliest, and
fortunately not before 2060 at the latest.
This sounds like a bad movie, but this time it's real.
If tomorrow, NASA announces that a giant asteroid will
crash into the earth in 10 years, people will think
about that every day. It will be continually on the
news. I am sure our society would try to make plans
to survive. In the oil case, it's different -- if you
try to explain to people that one day we will lack oil,
there aren't any huge reactions.
The end of oil production is not as impressive as
an asteroid coming to strike us, but the consequences
are pretty much the same.
Our governments are too conscious of the consequences,
and the general panic it will bring. If tomorrow, we
have a breaking news on TV, saying that in 10 years
there won't be any oil left, I am afraid of the general
reactions. I think everyone will rush and make reserves.
Following a pessimistic view, we can imagine wars, chaos,
etc., leading our world to an unimaginable crisis.
The first mission of the government is to warn its
population of the reality and what's bound to happen
before it's too late. I don't even want to imagine how
people will react if they are not warned beforehand.
When (and not if) one day we won't have oil anymore,
I hope we will be ready to anticipate the brutal changes,
instead of waiting passively for the last drop to be
swallowed.
I think that nowadays, there is not enough attention
paid to prevention. Recently in New Orleans, the terrible
human catastrophe due to the hurricane Katrina, shows
that we are definitely not ready to anticipate, and
yet anticipation stands for our best ally.
We don't have choice but to anticipate; oil resources
are not infinite. We have to start acting now.
We have to restrict ourselves. We have to reduce the
consumption right now. We have to find substitutes.
Some scientists say we can use ethanol instead or gas,
but nothing really concrete has been found now. That's
the official voice. I think that these new energies
are available, but our governments are protecting the
powerful oil lobbying by refusing to distribute them.
Nowadays, we are beginning to see some consequences
of the rise of oil prices, Delta Air Lines and Northwest,
two majors airlines, have a huge deficit, and have important
economical problems. The oil barrel is too expensive,
kerosene is not affordable as it was in the past.
Another example, this summer, I was in France, I fill
the tank of my car with only 40 liters, it costs me
65 euros ($72). A few days ago, the prices rose again,
you can buy one liter for 1.5 euro.
In the United States, it's the same phenomenon, even
if it's still a little bit cheaper than in Europe, but
I bet the prices are not going to decrease, unfortunately.
You can see how important oil is to our everyday expenses,
after the hurricane Katrina destroyed all the gulf coast
oil resources, the prices went high. In the U,S,, oil
consumers are mad because they have to pay more money
than ever to just use their cars, or take the plane.
But what if next summer, we missed this summer 2005,
what if next summer, we have to spend $100 to fill our
tank. We will have to admit that during summer 2005,
oil prices were pretty cheap.
The main question is what's going to happen concretely?
What's going to change in our lives?
According to some ecologists, it will be the end of
globalization, end of the aeronautics industry, as tickets
won't be affordable anymore due to the high prices of
oil. It will also be the end of international tourism,
end of economic growth, the crash of stock exchange,
the crash of the dollar, high unemployment rates, demonstrations.
But as oil is also essential in agriculture, its extinction
could mean not enough food for the entire planet.
To put it in a nutshell, we have to start thinking
about our future. We have to anticipate, we have to
start acting to preserve what we still have before it's
too late. The brutal change might be unbearable if not
anticipated, but at least we are aware of what approximatelly
will happen -- and when.
MS
MS |