|
Nobel laureate Pamuk's early novel, 'The White Castle,'
worth reading
By C. D Clawson
November 6, 2006 | Orhan Pamuk's The White Castle
recounts the story of two men -- one Italian, the other
Turkish -- as they advise a young sultan and solve the
problems of an ailing Islamic empire. Pamuk's reputation
as this year's Nobel laureate for literature and master
of historical fiction was initially intimidating. Works
by Nobel laureates are traditionally stuffy and overly
challenging, but I soon found, as I eased into this
novel, that it was surprisingly simplistic in nature.
The White Castle doesn't demand too much of
the reader's time and thought, and isn't clouded by
excessive description or by flowery language. Anyone
with a curiosity of Middle Eastern fiction should enjoy
this quick read of 116 pages.
In the opening chapter, Pamuk establishes his unnamed
narrator as a Venetian scholar uprooted from his life
as an engineer. His life changes completely when he
is kidnapped from a ship in the Mediterranean, then
imprisoned and enslaved in 17th Century Istanbul --
the gateway to the Middle East. Throughout the novel,
the fish-out-of-water narrator examines his life both
as a Westerner and a Christian in this Islamic society.
The book's nature is far more philosophical than visual,
which is both its strength and its pitfall. Soon after
his capture, the narrator meets Hoja, an impatient and
influential Turkish scholar who bears a striking resemblance
to the narrator. Pamuk illustrates how the two characters
instantly become curious of one another: "The resemblance
between myself and the man who entered the room was
incredible! It was me there... for that first instant
this was what I thought."
Making Hoja the narrator's double gives the book its
psychological edge. Hoja and the narrator, through resemblance
alone, form an antagonistic and contrasting relationship
at the core of the novel. Pamuk masterfully illustrates
the evolution in this relationship between Hoja and
the narrator; however, this is done at the cost of the
novel's pace.
Pamuk uses this relationship to explore the intricate
relationship between East and West and an ancient world
struggling to modernize. He weaves together thematic
threads of identity, memory, domination to form this
original and philosophical work of fiction. As the work
progresses, a cycle of domination and superiority emerges.
Initially, the two characters' identities mix and separate
like oil and water. As Pamuk explores memory and reality,
Hoja and the narrator explore each others' minds and
worlds, which slowly merge.
Reading The White Castle, it becomes apparent
why Pamuk has a reputation for controversy in his native
Turkey. Pamuk examines Hoja's (or rather the East's)
quick temper, closed nature, and jealousy towards Western
culture and contrasts it with the narrator's Western
rationalism, despair, and curiosity. This critical view
of Eastern culture outrages some in the Islamic world,
but offers a rich explanation of the East's relationship
with the West. As the two characters advise the young
sultan, Eastern mysticism and Western rationalism are
blended to answer the empire's various problems from
an outbreak of bubonic plague to the Ottoman invasion
of Eastern Europe.
If the book requires one thing, however, it's patience.
The book's philosophic emphasis weakens the narrative
aspects of pace and detail while focusing more on thought.
Pamuk's page-long paragraphs and philosophical tangents
on identity and sin require a bit more effort on the
part of the reader. Written dialogue is sparse, and
the pace of the novel is slowed as entire conversations
are reduced to a few paragraphs.
Reading The White Castle may not present the
most vivid picture of Istanbul or even of Islam, but
when examined more closely, the true purpose (and power)
of the work becomes clear as the two main characters'
relationship evolves. The reward comes in the final
pages when everything is made clear. Pamuk reveals an
underlying set of well-constructed paradoxes as the
book comes to its end.
The White Castle is one of Pamuk's earliest
novels and the first to be translated into English.
This quick read should appeal to anyone ready for philosophical
pondering and is an excellent opportunity to read a
Nobel-quality novel examining relationships between
East and West, and a valuable first read for anyone
curious or unfamiliar with the world of Middle Eastern
literature.
NW
RB |