Utah
looks for solutions to rising divorce rate
By Kelly Hafen
March 16, 2005 | Perhaps marriage
is not as easy as it appears to be, taking into consideration
that the average couple in Utah has an 18 percent chance
of obtaining a divorce within their first year of marriage.
This number jumps to 50 percent after five years and
70 percent after 10 years, according to www.utahmarriage.com.
Divorce,
or the termination of a marriage, increased during the
20th century in developed countries. The national divorce
rate has, however, been stabilizing, according to statistics
gathered by Victor
Harris . Utah's divorce rate, which is slightly
higher than the national average of 4 per 1,000, is
4.4 per 1,000.
The U.S. Census Bureau determined that 8.1 percent
of Utah's population, or 132,270 people, were divorced
in 2000. This number may be surprising due to Utah's
culture of strong marriages and family relationships
derived from the presence of the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints.
In fact, 91 percent of Utahns feel the number of divorces
occurring in this state are a serious problem, according
to a statewide survey
on marriage and divorce.The survey concluded that
if these trends continue, younger couples aid in increasing
the rate of divorce in Utah. The same study determined
that a large part of the problem was due to the "difficulty
in maintaining happy marriages."
In an effort to "promote and strengthen marriage ...
and increase awareness of the importance of marriage
to our state's well-being," former Gov. Michael Leavitt
and First Lady Jacalyn Leavitt developed the Governor's
Commission on Marriage. Aiming to reduce divorce rates
in the state, the commission developed a marriage website
, a marriage video, annual marriage conferences
and an online marriage preparation course. Other actions
have been taken across the state to ensure the future
of Utah's families.
Jackie Jolly, a divorce mediator for Common Ground
Divorce Specialists, would agree with the commission's
efforts to educate young couples before they are married,
as well as after.
"Often times people get a divorce because it seems
like the best and easiest thing to do," Jolly suggested.
"People need to be educated about life after divorce.
I think through education it might lower it (divorce)
a little bit."
As a divorce mediator, Jolly said her main goal is
to save marriages through marriage coaching. This type
of program is different from counseling, which is problem
based, she said. Marriage coaching aims at creating
a solution. According to their website, www.nocourtrooms.com
, the coaching is meant to develop communication
in a relationship. Coaches have been able to save 86
percent of the broken marriages that have participated
in their program.
"This is not therapy," according to the Website. "This
is hard core, look at yourself, stop blaming, start
communicating, learn how to really love again boot camp."
Besides the coaching, Jolly's job involves a lot of
mediation. This process works with divorcing couples,
annihilating the need for the court or an attorney,
said Jolly. This minimizes the fights that usually take
place in the court, she said.
Partakers of mediation are required to participate
in a weekly, two-hour session. Each week they are given
homework assignments that will make the divorce process
easier, Jolly said. The meetings are meant to answer
questions like "Who will drive the kids to soccer?"
and "Who will pay for their dance lessons?" Alimony
can also be discussed during these meetings.
Nikki Dunn, a mother of two who went through a divorce
a year ago, said the mediation may be helpful by resolving
"he said, she said" disagreements. It would also encourage
couples to give some and take some, instead of creating
and maintaining a selfish atmosphere.
"As far as communication goes," commented Dunn, "things
may be a little less heated between the two parties."
Mediation is meant to resolve issues that typically
occur in court before going to court, said Susan Seiler,
an assistant clinical director at the Bear River Mental
Health in Logan. Seiler suggested the courts can really
only create an adversarial situation. Whereas mediation
"helps people participate fully in the outcome. It strikes
for a win-win situation." For this reason, Seiler is
an advocate of the mediation program.
"It is kind of a difficult process for everyone to
go through," said Jolly. "When you go to the court,
the judges determine who gets what. During mediation,
the couple gets to decide. At the end of the sessions,
we have a mediation agreement."
Currently, mediation is not a prerequisite for divorce.
However, Jolly said legislation may be passed mandating
mediation. The bill would assist the courts, which "are
very ill-suited for family law," said Jolly. The bill
would attempt "to get the garbage out of court, that
in some people's eyes are really serious issues."
However, one mandatory class is required for divorcing
couples with children. Jolly said the class is supposed
to teach the parents how to co-parent. Taught by former
divorce attorneys, the duration of the class is two
hours. Attendees are given a certificate of completion,
which waives the 90 day wait period finalizing the divorce
and allows divorcees to submit their papers.
According to the Utah
State government's Website, "This divorce education
course is a prerequisite to receiving a divorce decree,
unless the court determines that attending the course
is not feasible, or is not in the best interests of
the parties." The same site explains the class as a
course on "children's needs." It provides instruction
for "both parties about divorce and its impact on children,
their family relationship, and their financial responsibilities
for their children."
Dunn was required to attend the class when she went
through her divorce. She said the class helped her and
her ex-husband get along better. Dunn said they were
given a book in the class, which she sent her ex-husband
after they were separated. The book is supposed to help
parents without custody understand they still need to
act like parents instead of like an aunt or a grandma,
she said. But Dunn admits, you won't learn anything
from the class, or the book, if you are not open to
their ideas and suggestions.
As for the class, Jolly said,"It helps the people
who are trying to do divorce right. There are quite
a few people who don't give a dang. For those who are
trying to make the best situation, I think it is a great
class."
Besides mediation, classes and marriage coaching,
there are several options for therapy and counseling
when a divorce is occurring. Locally, the Bear River
Mental Health facility offers therapy for individuals,
couples and children at anytime before, during or after
a divorce. Seiler said their main goal is to assure
that couples leave the relationship with positive feelings,
especially for those families with children.
In addition, Utah State University's Department of
Family and Human Development offers a Marriage and Family
Therapy Clinic.
The facility offers "high quality, low cost marital
and family therapy services to the public" while providing
training for students earning Master's in marriage and
family therapy, according to the Website, www.usu.edu/mft/clinic/info.html.
Ideally, the program strengthens relationships by focusing
on relationship strong points. The therapy is intended
to help people learn how to resolve their own problems.
Along with other efforts to strengthen the family
and decrease the rate of divorce in Utah, Republican
Rep. Peggy Wallace was recently seeking legislation
to eliminate no-fault divorces, according to an article
by Rebecca Walsh in the Salt Lake Tribune at
www.sltrib.com. The bill would have disallowed couples
with irreconcilable differences who were married for
more than 10 years or had minor children from obtaining
a divorce. A divorce could be obtained still for reasons
such as abuse or adultery.
Jolly said she feels the bill would hurt the divorce
process more than help it. She suggested people might
submit irreconcilable differences as reason to protect
themselves from public judgment, as divorce records
are public documents.
"The people I work with have really incredible reasons
for getting a divorce -- pornography, infidelity, a
controlling spouse or abuse," commented Jolly. "People
are just going to have to air their dirty laundry, if
the legislation passes. Dirty laundry exposure doesn't
make sense to me. By all means, let them call it that
(irreconcilable differences) instead of letting them
air all of their dirty laundry."
Dunn believes the legislation would help solve some
of the problems that may occur during divorce procedures,
but she doesn't think it would decrease the number of
people who actually get divorced. By solving problems
before appearing before a court, the court system will
not be as inefficient, suggested Dunn.
Seiler said she feels there isn't really anything
that can be done to protect marriages or make divorce
easier.
"Divorce is a serious event," Seiler said. "I personally
don't think that anyone enters marriage with the thought
or hope that they are going to get divorced. But the
loss is not to be underestimated, emotionally or physically."
NW
MS |